• a small property in the context of large historical buildings,
• foundation on very weak grounds,
• protection from light in offices,
• low cost of implementation,
• the possibility of expansion of the object,
• getting interesting architectural effect
• unable to compete with big and formally "rich" buildings,
• necessity to emphasize brownfield lineage of the park,
• lack of piling (foundation) because of the cost,
• no possibility of using high-tech solutions: movable blinds, ventilated facades, etc.,
• inability to use expensive materials: large glazing, wall coverings, blinds, aluminum,
• lack of protection from the sun through blinds – poor architectural effect,
• location of the building to allow construction of the second building in the future,
• adjustment of communication system in the building and the plot to the possibility of expansion,
• the need to obtain aesthetic effects at low cost.
• simple, neutral and synthetic form of the object, the lack of reference in materials to existing buildings so as to blend into the background,
• industrial aesthetics,
• limitation of the object to the ground floor + cheap special type of foundation - stone pillow
• execution of arcades + permanent blinds,
• use of decking material as blinds, simple, technical materials - concrete trim and floors, painting the facade, reducing the number and surface of the eye without losing the architectural effect (by unifying the facade with the blinds).
• Investment and operational savings thanks to applied "low-tech" solutions
• satisfaction of the Board of the new facility which is the subject of public interest,
• improving the company image – attractive building attracts new customers,
• free advertisement for the company thanks to “media life" of the building - information and discussion in social media, press interest and numerous publications, the use of the building by the City for promotional purposes.